I do believe that is what she is asking. However, and clearly in my opinion, the answer to that is the Department of Justice. That is their primary purpose, of course. To evaluate the law, and then bring charges against those they believe have violated it. But, they must of course prove their interpretations are correct, before judges and sometimes juries.
She should know this, and probably does, but doesn’t like that answer, so is fishing for someone else in government who could give a different interpretation than the one the DOJ is currently presenting her. If the DOJ truly did their homework, they will reply with government organizations they consulted, before bringing the charges forward, which is actually their role.
I agree. I also think she is getting them to concede whether they intend to go by what is written or just make up crap as they go along.