Lock Fauxcy up.
From the article: “Amid recent reports of exploding cancer rates around the world, a recent revelation from a top pathologist has shed light on the “phenomenon” affecting many of those who received the COVID-19 vaccine.”
From the linked study: “Between 1990 and 2019, cases of cancer in young people across the globe have increased by 79 percent and deaths have risen 28 percent.”
So, this increase has nothing to do with COVID or COVID vaccines despite the hysterical article headlines.
VAERS. Batch # may be important.
I’ve stopped all vaccinations in the past 3 years, including the flu vaccine. The medical industry has proven to me that they cannot be trusted, not anymore.
You go and actually look up the study and when it was conducted, which this article fails to mention directly, you find the date is from 1978 to 2019. Not only prior to any COVID vaccines, but prior to the pandemic itself. So the “time travelling vaccine” strikes yet again.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9938796/cancer-cases-young-adults-study/
Far from the first time this crowd has used old data trends to apply to times after the vaccine to make a conspiracy that doesn’t exist.
These people are absolutely shameless.
Be careful at this site. I hit two of the other links and got security warnings and refusal to open on both. I have Vipre security. I’m not going to it again.
interesting from the article some recent anecdotal hard numbers:
“Pavic said that 65 percent of all carcinoma cases among those aged between 15 and 59 received one or more COVID injections, with a 55 percent vaccination rate overall in the same age group.
This means that those vaccinated have a 52 percent increased chance of getting cancer.
...
“It’s important to note that all newly diagnosed carcinomas took the jab in 2021. In my hospital, we had 780 newly diagnosed carcinomas in the age group 55 and younger, with 560 of whom took one or more jabs. So this is 65% of the overall number of cancer diagnoses who took the jab.”
“What I found interesting was 150 of those people were diagnosed with cancer within six months of taking the jab,....”
the article says 65% higher odds for younger adults (the video has a tag of 52%. not so sure of that. didn’t see their math so i’ll do it my way: in her hospital, the delta is 65-35 = 30%. so of the 65 in a hundred who got cancer in the jab group, statistically there should have only been 65*.30= 19.5 cancers due to the natural odds. 65/30 = 1.49 so i get about a 49% increase, which is still very bad.
the article puts NZ and AUS at the top of the list. both of those are islands. so the least likely to have big out breaks (yes i know they are catching up now with a fury) and, suspiciously, the countries with the most enforced lockdowns and jab coercion (outside of maybe Israel), therefore the least amt of wuhan but the most amount of jabs. anecdotal but convincing enough to anyone with a modicum of common sense, i.e. any man, as CSL says, who possesses a ‘chest.’
Thanks for posting. Nuremberg 2.0
If only these victims got 10 booster, they would fully heal! (/S)
bookmark
A pathologist looks at slides and says if it is cancer or not and what kind of cancer.
An epidemiologist analyses morbidity and mortality data and looks for possible correlates or causes.
Very few pathologists have expertise in epidemiology. There may be a handful who claim to be experts outside of their area.
there’s another interesting inference (educated guess) i could draw from the article numbers:
it says cancer diagnoses amount to 135/100K in AUS vs 87/100K in the US in the article.
comparing the diagnosis rates just between the US and AUS, we get, 135+87 = 222 and so 135/222 = 61%. so we have 39% for the US giving us a difference of 61-39= 22%. so to me, the number also suggests 22 less working adults in 100 took the jab in the US then in AUS—if the jab is indeed causing most of the extra cancer.
now, if in AUS we estimate 95% took the jab, and we assume that is the reason for the difference in diagnosis rates, comparing ratios, we estimate that (95-22)% = 73% took the jab among the same cohort in the US. (doing this on the fly so check my math if you’re so inclined.)
so it gives me another indirect way of getting an estimate of how many took the jab among working adults in the US. that means we have at least 1 in 4 courageous and thinking adults still in America, which is a good thing.
i’ve seen estimates from the CDC saying that up to 90% adults took the jab in the US (which i don’t believe on it’s face). my estimate again argues against theirs. doesn’t surprise me in the least that theirs would be off by 20%. in other words, it supports my opinion that the the CDC lies with numbers every which way.
All in the name of DEPOPULATION in case you haven’t figured out what the Elites have done around the world!