Replies

“...there was no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt...”

There never was a doubt as to whether he had misplaced sensitive information. It was determined he couldn’t be cionvicted of it due to his mental incapacity. So why aren’t they initiateing the 25th amendment clause, section 4, which says:

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment was an effort to resolve some of the continuing issues revolving about the office of the President; that is, what happens upon the death, removal, or resignation of the President and what is the course to follow if for some reason the President becomes disabled to such a degree that he cannot fulfill his responsibilities.

It has been determined that President Biden is mentally incapable of the responsibility of securing sensitive documents which is parft of his duties as a president. This stance is also in effect after he steps down.

And the conclusion of the testimoney by special counsel Hur indicates that this failure is not just a single situation but has been identified in numerous locations that are included in the testimony. Since Biden is the candidate for the next general election, the houses of congress should start acting upon the 25th amendment for removal from office and to stop any possibility of a proven mentlly difficient person being elected into the office of the POTUS. And this means both sides.

wy69