Flying home.
I really like Japan. Polite, friendly people. Great food.
Taxi drivers typically wore suits.
The girls score again
—
Kremlin snuff box
https://t.me/s/kremlin_secrets
“Horror has returned to Crimea.” In one of the military units of Simferopol, 13 soldiers were poisoned to death
The emergency, according to our sources in the Ministry of Defense, the FSB and among the military who are in the city, occurred in the middle of last week. 13 people were found dead right in the barracks.
Before their death, the military drank vodka and ate pizza bought in one of the city’s pizzerias. Alcohol and food were poisoned with strong doses of arsenic and rat poison. The dead had virtually no chance of survival.
It has not been established exactly how the poisoned vodka and several pizzas got to the military. According to witnesses, a few hours before his death, one of the victims communicated with “two young girls who gave him something.”
The communication was casual, the fighter and the unknown people laughed and exchanged jokes, the females flirted with the military man.
Based on this information, there is reason to suspect that two young saboteurs are again operating in Crimea, who poisoned at least 50 of our military personnel in Simferopol, Bakhchisarai and Sevastopol in the fall and winter. Let us remind you that they tried to detain them in January, but the attempt failed, FSB officers were killed .
“If it’s them, it means horror has returned to Crimea. These are simply elusive criminals. I hope they will be found, otherwise... I don’t even want to talk about what will happen. There were rumors that they poisoned more than 100 people (note that we have no confirmation of this figure - ed.),” said the military man, who is now in Simferopol.
The FSB neither confirmed nor denied the involvement of Crimean saboteurs in the new fact of poisoning of our military. They promised to start searching for them as soon as the level of the terrorist threat in Crimea and Russia as a whole is at least slightly reduced.
Kremlin snuff box
https://t.me/s/kremlin_secrets
Who framed Patrushev in Kazakhstan and why?
Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev arrived in Astana the day before. The visit is certainly important. Patrushev has no others.
And it was on this day that State Duma deputy Gurulev decided to distinguish himself and declare that a plant for the production of long-range drones in Tatarstan was attacked by drones launched from the territory of Kazakhstan.
Obvious sabotage! How is it possible, during such an important visit, to make such sharp statements, which, moreover, are not supported by anything!
Yes, information is being verified that the drones could not have been launched from the territory of Ukraine ( which does not negate the involvement of the Ukrainian special services ). But why make such resonant statements and spoil relations with a strategic partner?
The answer is simple, although Gurulev’s immaturity is surprising. According to our information, Gurulev made this statement at the request of Shoigu. More precisely, by direct order.
Lately, Gurulev has been making a lot of statements, sometimes not always well thought out. But there are rumors that Shoigu promised Gurulev some kind of high post. Why Shoigu suddenly started handing out positions is still an open question.
But it is obvious that such statements during a top security official’s visit to a neighboring country are simply unacceptable!
It is worth noting here that Patrushev diplomatically settled everything on the spot. After short negotiations, the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan issued a statement emphasizing that the information about the launch of drones from their territory “does not correspond to reality.”
Moreover, Patrushev even managed to agree that the wording would be more vague.
Rate: “Information distributed in some Telegram channels...” It would not be comparable if the department’s statement had written: “The State Duma deputy is spreading fake news.”
This is where Patrushev’s role as a statist is manifested. The Secretary of the Security Council always thinks about what to say and when. Sometimes this sobriety is lacking in many of our officials.