Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SpeedyInTexas
NOELreports uses the words "American military instructors" in his x.com post.

The CNN link in NOEL's x.com post uses the words "American military contractors".

All other x.com blog posts that I have read also refer to "American military contractors".

Here's my take...mostly guesswork.

One or all of the military aid packages includes provisions that American military contractor corporations (Raytheon/Lockheed Martin) are prohibited from establishing subsidiaries in Ukraine.

This was probably done to gain enough votes to pass the legislation required for the aid packages.

The most cost effective way to support Patriots & F-16s would be for the OEMs to establish Ukrainian subsidiaries who would hire qualified personnel to support their respective systems.

OEM contractors routinely do this for the U.S. military.

Unfortunately doing this in a war zone is the highest risk option.

If legislation is required, this will be a tough sell.

JMHO

3,256 posted on 06/25/2024 6:15:22 PM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3252 | View Replies ]


To: FtrPilot

The original story said “lifting a de facto ban on American military contractors deploying to Ukraine, four US officials familiar with the matter told CNN, to help the country’s military maintain and repair US-provided weapons systems”.


3,257 posted on 06/25/2024 6:41:03 PM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson