Posted on 02/24/2024 5:59:01 AM PST by SpeedyInTexas
This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here. Loitering munitions, drones used as unmanned bait, civilian vehicles and derelict equipment are not included in this list. All possible effort has gone into avoiding duplicate entries and discerning the status of equipment between captured or abandoned. Many of the entries listed as 'abandoned' will likely end up captured or destroyed. Similarly, some of the captured equipment might be destroyed if it can't be recovered. When a vehicle is captured and then lost in service with its new owners, it is only added as a loss of the original operator to avoid double listings. When the origin of a piece of equipment can't be established, it's not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the equipment in question was produced prior to 1991. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
THERMITED Tank
“Video of an abandoned Russian tank destroyed with an FPV with thermite by Ukraine’s 30th Mechanized Brigade.”
https://x.com/RALee85/status/1841554769237753981
“Russians Do Break: Historical and Cultural Context for a Prospective Ukrainian Victory”
“For major wars like the one being fought between Russia and Ukraine, the military, the people, and the state interact with one another to constitute a collective national will to fight. In most wars, one side loses its will to fight and is forced into an unfavorable negotiating position; it accepts a defeat short of annihilation.
Russia can be broken in Ukraine and thereby forced to accept this kind of negotiated defeat. I argue here that the approach Ukraine and its Western allies are taking — the combined attrition of Russia’s military and the compression of its economy — has a good chance of succeeding if it can be sustained.
To understand how Russia can be brought to its knees, policymakers and the public first need to understand the historical and cultural influences that strengthen Russian will to fight. These admittedly discouraging factors go a long way toward explaining why Russia has not yet quit more than two years into this extraordinarily costly war.
But all people have limits. Despite benefitting from the longstanding historical and cultural strengths I describe in this article, Russia quit in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and it quit in Chechnya in the 1990s. History informs forecasting. In the case of the Ukraine War, a realignment of historical factors suggests there are good prospects for Ukrainian and Western victory.”
Someone with a hopium addiction is getting high on his own supply.
The front keeps moving west ever more rapidly. Russia’s army fully occupied the critical Ukrainian town of Vuhledar today, after more than two years pressing to capture the Donetsk region stronghold.
Speedy, Oryx has been exposed as being wildly inaccurate, and its founders had shut it down. Why are you trying to bring it back?
Two years to “capture” are you listening to yourself
The Wehrmacht would have loved this “rapid” movement
Saddam would have loved this “rapid”movement
The south would have loved this “rapid” movement
Then there is Kursk which was rapid movement
you neglect to mention that Russia is fighting the Ukraine plus NATO and America. Why haven’t the despicable globohomos won yet?
Given the 2+ years it has taken Russia to claim Vuhledar, how much of Ukraine might they be able to claim by 2200?
“The Central Bank of Russia has signaled for the second time in two days that it might raise the key rate at its next meeting.”
The expectation is for another full point increase, to 20% - but their situation is volatile.
More than one point would be expected to spook markets - but clearly, investors have already been spooked by the last several rounds of hikes, and the high geopolitical risk of investing in Russian securities.
“Russia’s army fully occupied the... town of Vuhledar today, after more than two years”
That is what you are calling “rapidly”...
It is a tiny fraction of the speed at which Russia lost territory in Kursk Oblast.
“On the home front, Russian civilians hit breaking points during both the Soviet and post-Soviet eras. As the Soviet war in Afghanistan ground on beyond its second year, it appeared that a combination of casualties (perhaps only one-tenth of those suffered thus far in Ukraine), increasing economic decline, and a general loss of belief in the war’s purpose took their toll. Recruiting and conscription numbers fell, and eventually Soviet leaders came to view the war as a “bleeding wound.” They withdrew in defeat. Catastrophe in Chechnya in 1994 also was fed by, and in turn led to, wavering Russian will to fight. These were entirely rational reactions to bad policies, bad treatment of soldiers, and bad economic conditions.
Putin has a breaking point, or at least a point at which he will settle on terms he finds unfavorable. While he presently retains dominant control over the state and enjoys at least an imposed version of popular support, Putin is aging and may be weakening. His surprisingly passive and initially incoherent response to Yevgeny Prigozhin’s revolt in 2023 caused a reexamination of his carefully constructed aura of invulnerability. Putin’s equally lethargic response to Ukraine’s 2024 Kursk incursion and his increasingly fantastical claims about Russia’s economy reinforce perceptions that he may be hurting.”
“Russian leaders appear to be aware of this worrisome problem in Ukraine. Generals are doing their best to hide casualties and keep wounded and distraught soldiers from returning home where, like the Afghansky of the 1980s, they might undermine popular support. They are desperately trying to use mercenaries, convicts, foreign troops, and unempowered mobilized troops to soak up casualties in order to keep their contract army intact. But Russia may be running out of cannon fodder. Military personnel costs are skyrocketing. Meanwhile, Putin is doing his best to maintain a veneer of economic normality. But his economy is almost certainly suffering under Western sanctions and market isolation.
Therefore, despite all the historico-cultural factors mitigating toward Russian endurance in this war, practical realities seem likely to intrude. Russia’s efforts to caulk over its vulnerabilities may be successful in the short run, perhaps through the beginning of 2025. But there is good reason to expect that the combined Ukrainian and Western strategy focused on pressuring Russia through battlefield losses and economic compression will succeed.”
“sources reported that at least 10 air defense systems were transferred to Iran just two weeks ago (from Russia). Including the latest S-400”
Maybe that explains the delay in the Israeli retaliatory air strikes - they found out that the Iranians and Russians had prepared a SAMbush for their aircraft, with newly installed Air Defenses.
They may be taking precautions to probe and map them all out first, to update their plan.
Alternatively, perhaps political pressure was applied to delay or preclude Israel’s expected counterstrike against Iran.
“Russians Do Break”
They mention Afghanistan and Chechnya, but WW1 was also a doozy for Russians breaking.
We have been counting it down on this thread, as Putin has wasted the old Soviet arsenals and Russia’s treasure of financial reserves. Those are both on track for hard breaks in 2025.
Senior Russian officials continue to set conditions to justify possible future aggression against the Baltic states. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko gave an interview to Russian state-sponsored media outlet Baltnews that was published on September 30 that portrays Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia as enemies of Russia that have chosen “confrontation” over peace and are supporters of Nazis and neo-Nazism.[67] Grushko claimed that the Baltic states gave up their sovereignty to bolster NATO even though NATO would use these states as the main defensive barrier in a future confrontation with Russia. Kremlin officials have previously used similar accusations of supporting Nazism to justify the invasion of Ukraine, and Grushko’s narrative is also likely aimed at scaring Baltic states from supporting policies that are contrary to Russia's interests in Europe.[68]
Russia continues efforts to codify state ideological values and is using these values to distinguish itself from Western countries. Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Consular Department Head Alexei Klimov stated that Russia may expand a list of countries whose citizens can move to Russia under simplified procedures for those individuals who reject “destructive neoliberal values” in their home countries.[69] Russian President Vladimir Putin instructed the Russian MFA on August 19 to create this list, which Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin approved on September 20, and the list includes 47 states that the Kremlin claims have “destructive” attitudes that clash with Russian “spiritual and moral” values.[70] The original list notably includes countries that have largely supported Ukraine since the start of the full-scale invasion, and Klimov did not offer an explanation as to which additional countries would be added to the list.[71]
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-2-2024
The Ruble death watch resumes.
Russian ruble down about 7% against the dollar over the last 30 days.
https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=RUB&view=1M
The ruble peaked at 84 cents on 19 June, but hit 96 on October 1st (since secondary sanctions hit). It is not just the dollar, the ruble is weakening against the Chinese Yuan and Indian Rupee as well..
Seems that the Central bank may be constrained in available foreign currency to continue propping up the ruble.
Financial ammo running low?
Correction: The Russian ruble peaked at 84 KOPECKS (Not cents) to the US dollar on June 19th, but weakened to 96 on October 1st.
I neglected nothing, it is well understood that NATO( which includes the US, America is a region not a country ie North America, South America…..) but also countries like Japan, India are providing raid, and Russia is being aided by Iran, NK, and China.
My point is that the Russian “victories” as reported by some here as amazing achievements seems a bit hyperbolic Just pointing out that 2 1/2+ years into this war the gains made by the Russians in historical context of wars, though real, are rather anemic especially when compared to losses sustained and size of military prewar.
Can Russia sustain these “victories” at such losses, I imagine so for awhile longer. The damage done to Ukraine is apparent, but what is the long term situation for Russia?
They have already ceded control of parts of Russia to China, they are dependent on China, Iran, and NK for supplies. Their petro industries were built on western equipment and technical assistance which is now nearly nonexistent.
Their economy is on a full war status with ever increasing levels of expenditure going to keep the war fed. Last winter showed examples of what is happening to internal infrastructure, and as bad as this coming winter is going to for be for Ukraine, I think that Russia will have an equally difficult time.
Russians have proven that they will endure a lot if there is “victory”, but history shows that endurance is not without limits.
Putin promised the Russians security and prosperity as well as victory. Right now their propaganda does not match with reality, and I think the Russian people are beginning to see this. Areas of Kursk are still held by Ukrainians and the October deadline to recapture seems unlikely. Battlefield loses continue to mount, even with large numbers of mercenaries recruited.
More Russians will be needed to feed the war and the war is encroaching more and more on his centers of power, St. Petersburg and Moscow, with the end not yet in sight.
Lastly it is interesting to note that the prewar rhetoric of saving ethnic Russians, demilitarization of Ukraine, stopping NATO expansion and of course de- nazification are not going well.
Hundreds of thousands of Russians have died and been wounded, Ukraine’s military is vastly stronger then it was before the war, and NATO added two countries that never would have happened if not for Russia starting this war.
In the end if this is what Russia (putin) wishes to say is victory, well so be it.
This war has indeed been costly for Russia as well as Ukraine, but as far as Russia is concerned it will probably be worse.
As you stated their Soviet legacy equipment and munitions are nearing exhaustion.
There once much touted and exported weapons systems have proven to be less than advertised and the once large part of their economy, weapons exports, is most likely gone for some time if not forever.
The idea of Russians ability to be self sustaining has also been proven false as the Russian streets are full of Chinese cars and stores full of Chinese products.
Their national wealth fund built up over years is rapidly being depleted if not already gone, who knows.
Putins desire to reestablish Russia on the world stage as a power player has seen Russia become a vassal state to China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.