Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Re: 119 - I’m sorry, but I don’t see it that way.

Let me ask this (as I don’t know the answer). Has a National Security Advisor ever met with FBI counterintelligence agents for a formal interview without ANY legal counsel present?

There was a concern, rightly or wrongly, that Flynn was under some type of foreign influence. The FBI investigated.

I believe Flynn exercised poor judgement when he did not take affirmative steps to have White House legal counsel present at the meeting. Frankly, that was not even his decision to make (to not have counsel present). The National Security Advisor represents the President on matters regarding national security.


120 posted on 02/09/2024 7:54:29 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

Do you have any understanding of how things went down with General Flynn? You DO know it wasn’t an “investigation by by the FBI for “foreign influence”, right?

You DO know he was deliberately targeted by the FBI and the DOJ, right?

If you like, I can explain it to you.


121 posted on 02/09/2024 8:41:13 AM PST by rlmorel ("The stigma for being wrong is gone, as long as you're wrong for the right side." (Clarice Feldman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson