I do agree that “Climate Change” is a fraud. But I think it’s a mistake to attack it on any sort of religious grounds. That’s a dead end, as I see it.
This is instead a free speech issue. At one time, science (and the general public) valued debate, and a constant free exchange of ideas. Those who push Climate Change have shut all that down.
We are now told that it’s “settled science”, and no further discussion is permitted. Try it, and you will be punished. This obviously goes against the basic values of a free society. And so that’s where Climate Change should be attacked.
Just my two cents.
That is basically the issue in the Mann v Steyn trial currently ongoing. Mann suing Steyn for telling the truth about him and his fraudulent “research.”
I do agree that “Climate Change” is a fraud. But I think it’s a mistake to attack it on any sort of religious grounds.
/\
and you would be dead wrong,
leaning right between marx and mao.
its a cult with zero valid science behind it.
and our country and world is being made to bend our knees to it.
Science is never settled. When people say the argument is settled, it enters the realm of BELIEF. It has become a religion. You are either a Believer or a Heretic.
It is very plain to see that Climate and CO 2 catastrophic predictions, are a religion. We really do not know what Science says, because billions are being paid for people to have an opinion in one direction.
They tell us we are in the pocket of Big Oil. THEY are in the pocket of Climate alarmism, and they don’t even know the facts. Or they are purposely ignoring the science.