You are half correct. A stay was quickly put in place, nullifying the preliminary injunction. Two days later, the stay was nullified, putting the preliminary injunction back into place, and keeping the unconstitutional law from going into effect.
I have an article at Ammoland on those changes. I will post it on freerepublic in a day or two.
I look forward to seeing it. I had only seen the first two stories and not the third. Amazing how these politically expedient cases get expedited hearings and rulings that can be reversed and reversed again in just 3 weeks with a holiday week in the middle.
That said, because 2A is an enumerated right, it should be subject to strict scrutiny and I hope that may be the reason the reversal was reversed.
So as of today, the restrictions are not in place?