Hoft "writes":
"American Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who served as managing editor of Reuters from 2011 to 2016, Paul Ingrassia, has reignited the fiery debate..."
No, Mr. Ingrassia has not reignited a debate about anything.
He died - in 2019.
And yet, Hoft's article cannot even get basic fact checking correct. And more seriously, Hoft attempts to mislead the reader by referring to Ingrassia's actions as in the present tense. Just pathetic and a good example of what a hack Hoft is.
Re: 88 - in clicking on the source article at American Greatness:
there are multiple articles by Ingrassia and then this:
“Paul Ingrassia is a Law Clerk, a two-time Claremont Fellow, and served on President Trump’s National Economic Council. He writes a widely read Substack that is regularly re-truthed by President Trump. His Twitter handle is: @PaulIngrassia.”
So Hoft was so lazy and slipshod that he got what may be? father and son mixed up.