Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Misleading Causes of the American Civil War
Flopping Aces ^ | 12-30-23 | Scott Malensek

Posted on 12/30/2023 12:56:39 PM PST by Starman417

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last
To: impactplayer

The Confederates were LUCKY that Lincoln was President. I’m telling you Jackson WOULD have hung EVERY single Rebel Leader.


41 posted on 12/30/2023 2:58:30 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND LEFTISM! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I would have answered:
“Sin aka Evil caused the Civil War”


42 posted on 12/30/2023 2:58:39 PM PST by Theophilus (It's far easier to rig a jury than an electionhe )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

“That would not have happened under Jackson, who would hav3 crushed treason quickly.”

He sure did a number on the Cherokees!


43 posted on 12/30/2023 2:59:04 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

“For openers, try any of Thomas Delorenzo’s works.”

Why should I read someone’s opinion when I can read the actual documents produced by the people who did the seceding?

The Declaration of Causes documents made it clear they were seceding because of slavery.

The Confederate Constitution where they prevented any state from abolishing slavery also showed their priorities (so much for states rights). “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed. “


44 posted on 12/30/2023 3:03:10 PM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty

Arkansas,Tennesee, Virginia and North Carolina all seceded to stop the “federal invasion” of the South. Slavery was not mentioned at all in their secession ordinances.


45 posted on 12/30/2023 3:03:52 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spok
In his reply Lincoln differentiated between "my view of official duty"—that is, what he can do in his official capacity as President—and his personal views. Officially he must save the Union above all else; personally he wanted to free all the slaves:[90]

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views. I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free.

46 posted on 12/30/2023 3:06:18 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli
Anybody who insists it was slavery and only slavery, period, is so historically ignorant they’re not worth arguing

Many of these historically ignorant people are Republicans.

47 posted on 12/30/2023 3:08:32 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
You would think during the war years 1861 - 1865 when most of the abled bodied patriot southerners were away killing Yankee scum that slaves would of had their best chance of a rebellion. But to my knowledge the number of slave revolts during that period was... wait for it....0, nada, ziltch.

Makes one wonder...

48 posted on 12/30/2023 3:13:47 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa
The Confederates were LUCKY that Lincoln was President. I’m telling you Jackson WOULD have hung EVERY single Rebel Leader and started a guerilla war.

Hmmm. I don't think so...

49 posted on 12/30/2023 3:14:45 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

The indians weren’t particularly fond of the “Great White Father” in Washington and his policies.


50 posted on 12/30/2023 3:17:04 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Oh, you better belive it. Lincoln fought the war with 1 hand behind his back. Jackson would have adopted Sherman style tactics in 1861.


51 posted on 12/30/2023 3:18:20 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND LEFTISM! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy; Spok
Spok, please note that DiogenesLamp clips off the final sentence. This is the easy “tell” that he is not being completely honest.

You are an @$$.

Yeah, i'm trying to hide it from him. That's why I told him exactly where it came from.

You imagine things that your own mind manufactures.

If you were in my presence, I would have hit you in the mouth for suggesting I was being dishonest.

I just grabbed the paragraph the way I found it. Copy and Paste. I don't even know what the last sentence was.

52 posted on 12/30/2023 3:19:09 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy; Spok
Here is the source I grabbed. If you will notice, the paragraph ends exactly where I grabbed the text.

https://housedivided.dickinson.edu/sites/lincoln/letter-to-horace-greeley-august-22-1862/

If you want to blame someone for leaving off the last sentence, blame the guy who created that page.

53 posted on 12/30/2023 3:22:52 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Follow this link to Greg Durand's America's Caesar

Fully documented eye-opener.

54 posted on 12/30/2023 3:25:45 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That’s because by far and large slave owners were benevolent and not bull whippers.


55 posted on 12/30/2023 3:26:31 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You are sloppy and dishonest. Lost Causers draw from Lost Cause sources. I have added the final qualifying sentence of Lincoln’s many times on these threads. See my post #20 (again, for the first time).


56 posted on 12/30/2023 3:29:20 PM PST by HandyDandy (Borders, language and culture. Michael Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

“I suggest you watch the famous documentary by Ken Burns.”

Burns is a pinko. Watch the Shelby Foote series of interviews,


57 posted on 12/30/2023 3:30:48 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty
Why should I read someone’s opinion when I can read the actual documents produced by the people who did the seceding?

All 5 million of them, eh?

You let 4 minority states tell you what to think, and *IGNORE* what the other 7 had to say. Why do you do this? Because you want to believe what you want to believe, and you aren't interested in anything that doesn't support what you wish to believe.

Virginia seceded because they viewed the Federal government attempting to raise an army to subjugate their sister states as Tyranny. Virginia was the most important state in the Confederacy, yet you ignore what the most important state had to say to focus on what bugtussel Mississippi had to say.

Not very objective, that.

58 posted on 12/30/2023 3:32:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stremba

“The South maintained slavery because it was integral to the economic and social structure.”

Exactly.


59 posted on 12/30/2023 3:32:26 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
I said Burns on purpose because it's the left that is pushing these fake gotcha questions on Republicans.

It will make it harder for them to refute a Republican who says to watch Ken Burns in their answer about the Civil War.

-PJ

60 posted on 12/30/2023 3:34:59 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson