The use of the word “Effective” is useless without first qualifying WHAT the criteria for Effectiveness is.
Example -
Was the Pfizer Covid Vax Effective at Killing People? There are indications that YES it was, and the truth is still elusive.
Was the Pfizer Vax Effective at preventing Covid? Well, the answer would appear to be NO considering how many and how often we heard of fully vaxxed people getting Covid 2,3,4,.... times, and the truth is still elusive.
Was the Pfizer Covid vax Effecxtive at reducing severity of symptoms? Well the answer to that may NEVER BE KNOWN because how do you measure severity? Some people had no real issues and were vaxxed. Others had no real issues and were unvaxxed. It’s almost like severity experienced came down to nothing more than a “Crap Shoot.”
In my opinion, as long as Ken Paxton’s law suit is specifically defining the parameters of Effectiveness, he has a real chance to DESTROY PFIZER. Now if that happens, EVERY LAST GOVERMENT OFFICIAL who mandated the Vax should also pay. Short Rope and Long Fall comes to mind!!!
TOTALLY AGREE. What I find amazing is the general lack of any useful data regarding this so that people can make up their own minds. Which leads me to conclude that they don't want people to make up their own minds, they want people to obey the government directive and/or mandate. They feel that they know better. It's the same with the flu shot, let's say it's 40% "effective" at reducing symptoms, they never say that and they just say go get it. Instead they need to tell you what the efficacy is, who is at risk, who might benefit from it, who would marginally benefit, who might not benefit. Also, with the covid shot, what are the side effects? For all this focus on Mr. Science Fauci, we never got presented any science, truly amazing.