A few months ago, a lawyer (can’t remember his name) was chastised by a judge for submitting untruths generated from ChatGPT. The dingbat came back with more hooey from ChatGPT.
Yup. I was listening to an interview on the Tom Woods Podcast, and the guests were a team that studies pandemics (Nick Hudson, Jonathan Engler), and they described many of the inconsistencies with the official line and the actual statistical reports of how and when it spread both in small, badly hit locations (e.g. Northern Italy) and large samples involving whole countries.
When he released information late at night that would not please the shot manufacturers, 42 minutes later, someone claiming to be a doctor posted a refutation, with 15 citations. As this was a new report, the guests wondered how there could be such a long response only 42 minutes , and posted at 3:00 AM? When they checked the 15 cites, only the first one had anything to do with the “pandemic”, all the rest were random legal cases. Looks like this “doctor” used AI.