Likely
Ben
Levin
VDH
glen beck
All pretty bright especially the first three
They see the problem here especially demographics is destiny (boy howdy that applies to Israel in spades ) but they refuse to name it or replacement theory
They cling to polyglot unity theory which can miraculously work here to them
And they mold their historical facts especially about my region to support that which always irritates me as intellectually dishonest
When I know smart as they are they know their history better
If not they should read A Disease in the Public Mind which has uncanny relation to today
Shapiro is crackerjack bright
VDH erudite as hell I like to hear him wax
He did an encapsulation of the Biden era two days ago on his pods which was good
Very few talkies who really get it honestly
But we need all we can our side so I tolerate them
Pelham and I are Gottfried fans but even he goes off reservation too
Shapiro disdain for Trump borders on clinical
Boring his partner seems to be of the same work
Only Michael Knowles in their stable is unabashedly pro Trump
I’m not sure how to tell a protoneocon from a garden variety neocon but it’s an interesting idea.
I do agree that Victor Davis Hanson, Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro share most of neoconservatisms basic beliefs. But then I suspect that most Republicans today do. Meaning that they what they say would be indistinguishable from Cold Warrior liberal Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans.
Usually the tell for those of us interested in such ancient history is Liberal Internationalism in foreign policy, and gushing praise for the Civil Rights Act. Today’s conservatives would be outraged to learn that Ronald Reagan, Bill Buckley and Barry Goldwater all opposed the CRA. And then they’d wonder how we ended up with a Woke Big Brother government openly hostile to evil white male America.