The sooner the better— and timed well within the single issue voting on funding the government. Somewhere in there focusing on the demonrats who have censored the videos and and continuing J6 cases going on and reversing those already adjudicated.
Incidently, the basis for the main charges being federally decided— has been one LINE in the Sarbanes-Oxley banking legislation (they had to dig deep down to get this one Federal Crime applied to peaceful protestors and NOT to the HIRED agent provocateurs of Pelosi-from AntiFA and BLM btw).
The charge: charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so.”
This language comes directly from a federal criminal statute found at 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Because it was added to the law in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, J6 defendants have been saying the DOJ has misused it. This complaint also specifically matters because it’s the same criminal law former J6 kangaroo member Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), vice chair of the Jan. 6 Select Committee publicly flagged to incorporate in the “case”- former President Donald Trump. The complete release of all 14K hours of the videos will go to prove the CREATION of the crime from this obscure “statute” out of normal 1st Amendment rights of non-violent protest, by proving the existence of false ACTORS in the actual violence— people like Ray Epps (Fedgov paid agitator).
You mean he was our secret weapon all along.
‘Be careful what you wish for’ doesn’t apply here with the rats. The 8 or so rebels on our side don’t play. The rats got a couple of weeks out of it.
Since this applies to any official proceeding not just counting of the votes for the presidential election, why isn’t it being used against code pink types who actually go onto the floor of the house of representatives and disrupt. I guess I know the answer already.