Our grotesque pollution and destruction of habitat is really hard to argue.
And cutting billions population of our least productive would of course massively increase the elite’s relative natural resources.
The question I would have for the elites is what steps have you taken to motivate the unproductive to be more productive.
Most of their policies go in the opposite direction—just make the problem worse.
“Our grotesque pollution and destruction of habitat is really hard to argue.”
I agree pollution is a problem, but it can be repaired if people were not lazy and selfish about lifestyle. What have you personally done about your footprint? Or are you one of those who wants everyone else to do it but refuse to make a few personal sacrifices of convenience and standard of living towards the cause? Control population so that you can personally keep your own lifestyle?
“Destruction of habitat”, I once had a perspective about Japan because there were so many tales of over population and habitat destruction. Tons of images shared about how packed into small spaces they are. I believed the propaganda about how they had encroached on all their natural habitat and were now packed in like sardines.
Then I got on Google earth and looked at it from satellite. Turns out that even though more than average only about 15% of japan is occupied. Most of the island is preserved wild lands. The brainwashing was just not true. And it is the same world wide...
“And cutting billions population of our least productive would of course massively increase the elite’s relative natural resources.”
OK, you first pal!
Who gets to decide on “least productive”, anyway?