Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

Well stated. I’m good with most of that.

My main problem involves my lying eyes when I watch that head shot. My mind tells me that bullet came from the front. Instant acceleration at the same time as the head shot might explain the movements ... maybe.


33 posted on 09/11/2023 7:22:52 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

>> My main problem involves my lying eyes when I watch that head shot. My mind tells me that bullet came from the front. Instant acceleration at the same time as the head shot might explain the movements ... maybe. <<

What’s counter-intuitive is that you see the FRONT of Kennedy’s head appear to explode, so it’s easy to think he was shot from the front. But if you look at frame 313 of the Zapruder film, (https://www.schooltube.com/watch/zapruder-film-jfk-assassination-hd_lk8h5ryj0xzxo8.html ) you see the spray of brains from his head shoot forward, and THEN Kennedy’s head rock back, and the mist moves backwards relative to the car’s motion.

Watch any high-powered rifle’s bullet pierce any target; the big mess is always at the EXIT wound. Kennedy’s head was clearly shot from behind.

But also watch when he first clutches his throat, at frame 220. This is ONE HUNDRED frames before his head is blown away. The claims that marksmen couldn’t shoot and reload in almost 100 frames is just absurd. The conspiracy theory rests on the notion that JFK was not shot in frame 220, but instead I guess he has some urgent desire to straighten his bowtie or something.


82 posted on 09/11/2023 9:52:53 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson