[Michael.SF.]

I have read a lot of books on the assassination, including Bugliosi’s tome. I have not read ‘Case Closed’. Bugliosi also changed my mind but, he only got me to a 95% certainty.

Here is why I still have a little doubt: One book I read was ‘Appointment in Dallas’ by Hugh MacDonald, a man with impeccable credentials and well known to Bugliosi. ‘AD’ makes the case for a second gunmen with LHO being a patsy. His story makes sense out of Oswalds actions and statements after the shooting.

I was hoping Bugliosi would address the case made by HM, instead, he ridiculed him. I was disappointed in VB for doing so.

None the less, VB’s book was extensively researched and makes a very strong case. If I was a juror on the LHO trial, I would vote to convict.

[BDParrish]

"I have read a lot of books on the assassination, including Bugliosi’s tome. I have not read ‘Case Closed’. Bugliosi also changed my mind but, he only got me to a 95% certainty..."

I will be very interested in your reaction to Posner. Please take a look at it and I will read Bugliosi on your recommend.

[karnage]

Bugliosi’s book took care of any lingering doubts that I might still have had after Posner’s.