exactly.
Even if anyone thinks there is merit to this idea, Trump has not been convicted of anything.
Since Trump has not been convicted of anything, legally speaking, there is no legal merit to this lawsuit.
do you think judges will toss it?
or do you think he will have to fight this all the way to the USSC?
wasting time and money
“Since Trump has not been convicted of anything, legally speaking, there is no legal merit to this lawsuit”
Since these demons couldn’t give 2 shits about the law, that won’t stop it.
"Constitution? We don't need no steenking Constitution" - Communist controlled judicial system
“Since Trump has not been convicted of anything, legally speaking, there is no legal merit to this lawsuit.”
Robert E. Lee was never convicted, but he was clearly barred.
They did the same thing to DeLay and Stevens, convicted them of bogus charges with a heavily Democrat jury in time to get them out disqualified to hold office, then slow walk the appeals until any remedies were moot.
That does not matter. The 14th uses the term "engaged" in insurrection; no conviction is required.
All that is needed is a Governor or a Secretary if state to agree that Trump "engaged" in what they believe was an insurrection. Trump's lawyers will then need to take to the Courts and ultimately SCOTUS.
But by the time that happens, Trump will be off the ballot in multiple states, Democrats win and mission accomplished.