Address all the points on a technical basis and refute them, including references.
The law is technical as you obviously know. There are many who believe this is the case. So make the case. There is not a footnote in the Constitution saying “this is only for fun! If ya wanna fry the SOB a coupla years after he leaves office, knock yerself out!”
No. You can find a sixth grade social studies teacher to explain this to you without my assistance. I'm done arguing with idiots. This used to be a forum filled with people who knew how to read and think critically, now it's just a pile of sea lions barking "what's your proof! Cite your sources! 4D Chess!" to a world that is clearly playing by a set of rules they refuse to acknowledge.