Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/21/2023 5:10:57 PM PDT by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: davikkm

“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Mr. Roberts said . “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”

Well, OK then.....


2 posted on 08/21/2023 5:17:28 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

horse hockey.


3 posted on 08/21/2023 5:18:38 PM PDT by MrHead (I souldn't have to change for other peoples comfort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

So by the Court’s logic, you are a private citizen until the media slanders you. Then you become a public figure and can’t sue them.

In short, the media enjoys absolute immunity under the first amendment.

You and I? We are spreading “misinformation” and enjoy none.

Look for this one to be appealed.


5 posted on 08/21/2023 5:35:37 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Sandmann, who was only a 16-year-old at the time of the encounter ...

This is how a minor is treated? The USA is not even a civilized country!


6 posted on 08/21/2023 5:39:54 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Sandmann’s attorneys will file for an en banc hearing which will involve all the judges on the Court of Appeals.

Haven’t read the opinion, but know that a plaintiff doesn’t become a public person because of their complaint becoming national news and coverage.


7 posted on 08/21/2023 5:46:39 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Read the opinion. The majority opinion is bullshit.

Read the dissenting opinion. It’s brilliant. If the en banc hearing doesn’t go Sandmann’s way, this disse.ting opinion is a road map for the SCOTUS.

This is a case the SCOTUS would surely take


9 posted on 08/21/2023 5:59:12 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
I always tell people not to bring a lawsuit without preparing for at least one appeal because judges are such petty tyrants. Even on appeal, they can just make things up. I'd need to read the opinion, but if this doesn't get reversed en banc it could well go to SCOTUS.
10 posted on 08/21/2023 6:10:34 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Another great American gets it stuck to him by a bunch of freeloading, black robed, Feral tyrants. The Blacks are right. Americans don’t stand a chance in this country’s “judicial system.” It’s weaponized against them.


11 posted on 08/21/2023 6:15:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Welcome to Amerika! Have you filed a lawsuit today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Sounds like a couple far left wing bench biatches got him.


12 posted on 08/21/2023 6:24:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Welcome to Amerika! Have you filed a lawsuit today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

....so then the sandy hook parents by extention ALSO have no standing to sue Alex Jones right?

And didn’t that little queer “looking” kid that attempted to compete with Mike Lindell sue Laura Ingraham for defemation?


16 posted on 08/21/2023 6:51:45 PM PDT by patriot torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson