What was needed was a re-canvass and true, independent audit.
A Risk Limiting Audit is just a sampling of a few ballots across different precincts and compare against the machine tally. Also, I have yet to see a report on who oversaw this sampling, and was it random? Was it independent? Was it sampled from areas that didn’t see as much discrepancy than others?
Also, it is important to note that in several counties the recount did not match the machine totals, but officials were told to “go with the state official results”. The ones that did push back had their election officials reprimanded and/or fired.
that’s what i thought. no one dug deep - unless DJT’s upcoming report tells us otherwise.