Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Make no mistake: This was a deliberate targeting of civilian populations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were pristine, and could thus fully showcase the bombs’ power. Hiroshima was home to a small military headquarters, but the fact that both cities had gone untouched by a strategic bombing campaign that began 14 months earlier certifies their military and industrial insignificance.

I heard they were chosen because of they were strategic militarily.

158 posted on 08/07/2023 2:35:55 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
I heard they were chosen because of they were strategic militarily.

Japanese industry at the time was highly dispersed, as a deliberate defensive measure. Just about any Japanese city was "strategic militarily". USAAF had a list (and checked it twice) and they were all "naughty". Some more so than others. Hiroshima and Nagasaki hadn't been hit with incendiary bombing (yet), just because they weren't at the top of the list. This made them ideal targets for the atomic bombing: militarily significant, but as yet undamaged. Also, Nagasaki wasn't the primary target for Bock's Car ... IIRC, Kokura was. But Kokura was completely overcast so they hit their secondary target (Nagasaki) instead.

Incidentally, USAAF ran a "leaflet bombing" campaign in late July, 1945 warning that any of several cities were about to be destroyed and that the citizens thereof should evacuate.

191 posted on 08/07/2023 7:13:52 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson