[beancounter13]

Fair enough. I will concede that the OT was written scripture. How does that discredit the rest of my assertion?

[Skwor]

Well I will start with this

"It was all merely oral tradition. Only two of the gospel writers were actually there, and they were writing from memory that was quite dated at the time! What can you vividly remember from 30 years ago?"

You infer potential inaccuracy of scripture due to second hand accounts and the passage of time. This flies in the face of even Catholic teaching that Scripture is inspired and accurate. The RC vs Prot debate involves how to read scripture and where the authority for interpreting it comes form. neither question the accuracy or trough of scripture.

Scripture is considered from God and regardless who or when written is accurate and truthful as the Holy Spirit was how the inspiration was received. There was no relying on just a person's memory of poorly scribbled notes, the information came from the Holy Spirit..