Raffensperger and all the rest of the globalists, criminal leftists and rinos have ONLY TWO CHOICES.
1. keep on with your little game and then take the fatal hit
2. turn state’s evidence and maybe have a chance
Prosecute Raffensperger and give him 10 years in the pen.
My best friend attended the Forsyth county GOP meeting several wee ago. At one point she struck up a conversation with a GOP committee member who had been down at the Capitol building. She said that a state rep told her Governor Kemp and Raffensberger made it known that they were not going to do anything else regarding election fraud reform.
he’s a crook
Fox - SUE Raffensperger for 100s of millions as he held back exculpatory evidence you could have used in the out of court settlement with Dominion.
“can be”
Lots of thing “can be” done.
“Raffensperger will not install Dominion’s security patches before the 2024 election.”
Ok, and this report sounds like a “how to” guide on hacking them.
It would be a real shame if someone took advantage of Raffensperger’s refusal to patch the machines and followed this “how to” guide to switch all of Georgia’s votes to Trump. Real shame.
The Fox/Murdoch/Dominion never-Trump partnership is in full swing now.
One of the things I find interesting, said there doesn’t seem to be any more Kemp or Raffensberger supporters on here anymore.
But he was great for Covid. Ha, ha ha
Seems like there’s lots of buyers remorse, when the people could’ve made a change, they chose not to. And now we have this mess.
But Purdue ran a lousy campaign. Walker was a lousy candidate. Hice ran, a lousy campaign.
All while kemp is selling out the state and Raffensberger want to change all the voting laws
As someone who was in the IT business for 38 years, this article could be written about any city, county, state and corporation in the world that uses computers, servers, etc.
The only part I would question is the refusal to install the security patches, I would like to know why that is and what the security patches are supposed to do.
What I mean is, some customers install the latest version of software with the security patches build in and have no need to install any other patches, the patches talked about in this article could very well be for customers using older versions of the code who need the updates versus someone who already has the latest code versions and has no need to install anything.
I would be far more concerned with the procedures to verify vote totals and the people involved in the voting process than I would be with the machines themselves.
Paging Jenna Griswold!
CREEPY DIRTY LOOKING RAFFENSBERGER is a DISGUSTING SLIME DEMOCRAT!
WHAT? They will CHEAT AGAIN? Come on, man. That can’t possibly be true...... These are good and fair upstanding people of faith and honesty. You can trust them...
Bookmark.
He needs to do the rope dance
https://www.gaconstitutionparty.org/totenburg_ruling_second_cpga_federal_court_win_in_three_years (August 19, 2019)
ATLANTA, GA – Thursday Judge Amy Totenberg of the U.S. District Court of North Georgia banned the current Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting systems from further use in Georgia elections beginning in 2020. The DRE system produces results that cannot be verified by the voter, audited by election officials or recounted for candidates. The court found the system impairs Georgia voters’ Constitutional right to vote in any federal election.
Constitution Party of Georgia (CPGA) Chairman Ricardo Davis is a plaintiff in the case that obtained the landmark ruling; no other political party had leadership that participated as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. It was the second federal election court win for CPGA plaintiffs in three years. CPGA plaintiffs participated in a successful ballot access lawsuit that reduced Presidential ballot access petitioning requirements by 85% in the 2016 election cycle.
The landmark ruling essentially reverses a 2008 Georgia Supreme Court decision where the court refused to apply a strict scrutiny legal standard to the Constitutional right to vote for Georgia voters. Davis and CPGA Elections Director Garland Favorito where plaintiffs in that case.
The ruling Thursday came as no surprise to those who attended a July hearing that revealed the state had concealed key internet exposures and vulnerabilities from the court. Totenberg’s comments cited “inconsistent candor” by the defendants in “denial and dodging” of the “broad scale vulnerability” involving the 2017 internet breach of the election servers at Kennesaw State. She concluded: “the Defendants’ contention that the servers were … not intentionally destroyed or wiped is flatly not credible.”
Judge Totenberg’s ruling requires the state to implement a backup plan of hand marked paper ballots if the system replacing the current DRE system is not ready for the March Presidential Primary.
Judge Totenberg’s 147-page opinion in Curling v Raffensperger / October 11, 2020.
While she ultimately did not grant plaintiff’s motion, she detailed numerous problems within Georgia’s electronic voting system.
https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/curling-v-raffensperger-rulling-101120.pdf
//
It’s obvious that the powerful interests behind the push to electronic voting want it to be as unaccountable as possible. They have armies of lawyers and deep deep pockets. They seem to have selected Georgia as ground zero in the battle to nationalize and normalize election malfeasance, all the while shouting from the rooftops how “safe” their systems are.
If there’s one thing that will put the final nail in the coffin of the American Republic, this is it.
Indict Kemp and Raffensperber for defrauding Ga. voters.