“I wonder why the author stopped at Kavanaugh and never even mentioned Amy Coney Barrett....”
Maybe because she has been absolutely 100% conservative on 2A cases, she voted to overturn Roe v Wade, she voted 100% against the EPA in the wetlands case, she voted in favor of state of Alabama and against creating another black Alabama House district.
I guess she doesn’t meet some impossible FR Purity Test, but she’s been a good Justice. Thank God we got her instead of Merrick Garland. Imagine him with a lifetime appointment to the Court.
There is no “impossible FR purity test”.
It should be offensive, notwithstanding (and it is ironic already), to have RINOs demand purity of Trump while they ignore gross impurity out of the Uniparty at large.
There are Purity tests on Free Republic.
If any judge has an opinion which certain Freepers disagree with, that judge is condemned as worthless.
It doesn’t matter what other opinions such a judge has issued. There is no sense of balance or proportion. A single deviation from any Freepers judgement, is enough to condemn such a judge as having been a wasted Supreme Court nomination.