Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Damning Paragraphs: Prof. Alan Dershowitz Dishes on Trump's Indictment
Red State ^ | 06/10/2023 | Jeff Charles

Posted on 06/10/2023 7:02:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SamuraiScot

>> give him free rein

of course, especially of the recipients of said disclosures were deemed by POTUS to be vital operatives.


21 posted on 06/10/2023 11:38:09 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
‘as President I could’ve declassified it. Now I can’t, you know, but this is still [a] secret.’

If Trump actually said this and read or showed the document to those without clearance, he is in trouble.

If one of those people can be shown to be a foreign agent (known or unknown to Trump) then his goose is cooked.

22 posted on 06/11/2023 3:15:01 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Indictments are not evidence. They are a summary. I’m sick of the Trump drama. He needs to go away.


23 posted on 06/11/2023 4:11:21 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita

Drama is what drives the Dems attack to make trump supporters leave trump... apparently working on you


24 posted on 06/11/2023 5:03:57 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted on federal charges in an investigation into his handling of classified documents, according to an indictment unsealed on Friday.

The indictment comes after more than 100 documents with classified markings were found at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in August 2022.

Trump has been charged with 37 counts: 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information; one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice; one count of withholding a document or record; one count of corruptly concealing a document or record; one count of concealing a document in a federal investigation; one count of scheme to conceal; and one count of false statements and representations.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/trump-indictment/?id=99913217


25 posted on 06/11/2023 5:12:23 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Observator

We have a plan to attack every nation in the world. Attacking Iran?? Who classified it?? He could declassify it.


26 posted on 06/11/2023 7:37:29 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
We have a plan to attack every nation in the world. Attacking Iran?? Who classified it?? He could declassify it.

And he did. The Standing Order explicitly declassifed all documents traveling from WH1 to WH2. Even that was unnecessary since the President can decassify anything anytime according to the Constitution.
27 posted on 06/11/2023 7:44:40 AM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

[Trump] didn’t show it to [the other person], he just kind of waved it in front of him as part of his kind of bragging.

Throwing whatever they can against the wall and hoping something will stick.

Judge Roy Bean judgement in action.

This isn’t a trial it’s a lynching


28 posted on 06/11/2023 9:28:24 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
[Trump] didn’t show it to [the other person], he just kind of waved it in front of him as part of his kind of bragging.

That is contradicted by the transcript. In the transcript, while discussing the document Trump says to the writer “this is XXXX’s plan, read it” and later says, “I’ll show you an example”. So he did more than wave it around, he had the writer read it. Now in the 2nd instance, you might be right, where Trump showed a map to a PAC member but told him not to get too close. But Trump is not being charged for either of those incidents. They apparently are included to show Trump handled classified intelligence carelessly and that he knew he had documents that were still classified.

29 posted on 06/11/2023 9:35:20 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Yep, everyone is talking about the recording but it has been edited and taken out of context......


30 posted on 06/11/2023 9:40:02 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

That’s not true. Sperry is referring to a summary of the incident listed early in the indictment and ignoring a 2-page account and transcript of the incident included later in the indictment. Read the indictment, especially the quotes from the transcript. The actual quote from Trump was, “This is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information.”

But ultimately, whether Smith omitted those words or not is immaterial, since Trump was not charged it’s sharing classified information. So the omission of those words from the indictment would no impact any of the actual charges filed.


31 posted on 06/11/2023 9:49:57 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

I think this is probably true, which explains why Trump was not charged with sharing classified information. But this does not impact any of the charges actually included in the indictment. So you can categorize this tweet as accurate, but irrelevant.


32 posted on 06/11/2023 9:52:09 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Yep, everyone is talking about the recording but it has been edited and taken out of context......

LOL edited? Try a Deep Fake from the Deep State.
33 posted on 06/11/2023 10:07:04 AM PDT by Observator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson