Posted on 06/09/2023 6:55:58 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
President Trump lashed out at Special Counsel Jack Smith after a federal grand jury in Florida hit him with a 37-count indictment related to the classified documents case.
..... Snip.....
Trump called Jack Smith a “deranged psycho” on Friday.
“This is the man who caused the Lois Lerner catastrophe with the IRS. He went after Evangelicals and Great Americans of Faith. The United States had to apologize, and pay major damages for what this deranged lunatic did. He had a unanimous loss in the Supreme Court. His wife is a Trump Hater, just as he is a Trump Hater—a deranged “psycho” that shouldn’t be involved in any case having to do with “Justice,” other than to look at Biden as a criminal, which he is!” Trump said on Truth Social.
Trump highlighted the two-tiered justice system in a pair of social media posts.
“Biden moved his Boxes all over the place, including to Chinatown and up to his lawyer’s office in Boston. Why isn’t deranged Jack Smith looking at that? Also, I supplied them openly, and without question, security tape from Mar-a-Lago. I had nothing to hide, nor do I now. Nobody said I wasn’t allowed to look at the personal records that I brought with me from the White House. There’s nothing wrong with that….” Trump said.
“….Biden had records for years, totally unsecured, even stolen when he was a Senator. This is crazy! Just like Jack Smith, Lisa Monaco, and the man they sent to the D.A.’s Office, Matt Colangelo. It isn’t America anymore. Under the Presidential Records Act, I’m allowed to do all this. Under the Clinton Socks Case, the decision is clear. There was no crime, except for what the DOJ and FBI have been doing against me for years.” Trump said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
No, I would hire the best legal minds in the country (which I could do as a billionaire) and I would follow their advice.
Which I don't think would include calling the prosecutor "a deranged psycho."
But maybe I'm wrong. I hope so. Maybe this is the opening of the most impressive legal strategy in history.
That's certainly what's needed at this point, so if so, great.
Jack Smith also prosecuted John Edward’s trying to knock him out of the race when he was the frontrunner for Pres. Smith lost that case, but accomplished his goal: to get Edward’s out of the way. Jack is a ruthless, partisan and cold-blooded killer.
The problem is the way the Feds have come after Trumps previous lawyers they end up quitting because of the harassment so finding good representation hasn’t been easy.
We haven’t heard the tape and will never know the information in any of these documents.
That means we have to “trust the process” of a corrupt law system.
They’re trying to take out a former President, with no clear precedent for their actions....they’re making it up as they go along.
Once again Trump is being treated differently than Clinton, Bush, Obama, Pence, & Biden. Nobody gave a rip about what documents these jokers had over the years.
Get Trump no matter the legality has been the MO for over 7 years.
“He did NOT break any laws!!!”
Um...he almost certainly did and discussed it on tape! It is still a politically motivated prosecution, but he’s almost certainly guilty of crimes.
That Biden is guilty of far worse won’t help Trump in court. His only real hope is jury nullification and that isn’t likely if the prosecution is done in DC.
“In July 2021, at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey (“The Bedminster Club”), during an audio-recorded meeting with a writer, a publisher, and two members of his staff, none of whom possessed a security clearance, TRUMP showed and described a “plan of attack” that TRUMP said was prepared for him by the Department of Defense and a senior military official. TRUMP told the individuals that the plan was “highly confidential” and “secret.” TRUMP also said, “as president I could have declassified it,” and, “Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret.”
I can think of another explanation. Perhaps he doesn't follow their advice, and goes out to the media and makes statements that make their jobs impossible, and they give up on him.
Only Trump the top-level political operator can decide how and when to communicate. Or to remain silent.
Nobody has ever been in the shoes he’s in right now.
Plus he is not one to refrain from announcing that the Emperor had no clothes.
The prosecutors have the tape. They quote it verbatim. It won’t be “he said / she said”. They’ll just play the tape. Courtesy of Trump’s boasting.
Good grief. And I’m supposed to stick with him through thick and thin, or else I’m an “anti-Trumper.”
Ya didn't know that until they did it and continue to do to Trump. What's your suggestion?
As freeper vivenne points out - it served to knock Edwards out of the running for president.
I notice another pattern - savaging the spouse of the political target - basically curbstomping the spouse.
cold-blooded sociopath.
Show us the security tapes.
You’ve heard the recording?
The last couple of lawyers probably quit when they realized Trump had lied to them.
They quote the tape. They don’t do that if they cannot PLAY the tape!
>> Calling your accuser a “deranged psycho”
Does it really matter what a deranged psycho is called?
And the Democrat will get the most fake ones and take the Whitehouse.
2020 all over again.
Not what I want but what I see happening.
They will do this regardless of who is at the top of the ticket.
I've already made my analysis.
2024 is gone, and the junta will continue in power.
I'm going to keep my head down, get back the money the government stole from me over my working life, and emulate a honey badger if anyone gets in my business.
Well I'm not a $5000/hr lawyer, but I think I might suggest not going out to the media and calling the other side a deranged psycho.
But as I said, what do I know?
I’m (figuratively) from Missouri. Show me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.