My guess is that there are AZ rules for evidence. A wild guess is that these videos don’t approach being admissible.
The rules are there for a reason. Why does that confuse and anger people?
“The rules are there for a reason. Why does that confuse and anger people?”
Reminds me of a scene from “A Man For All Seasons”
The rules are there for a reason. Why does that confuse and anger people?
Because people's inherent sense of justice does not approve of legal tricks to avoid the truth.
Let me give you an example of the absolute stupidity that modern legal methodology produces.
Let's say you have a murderer living in a cardboard box. Lets say the police do an illegal search and find the murder weapon.
First the idiot judge rules the cardboard box is the vagrant's "home", and therefore the search was "illegal." The Judge throws out the evidence because it is the "fruit of a poisoned tree." The criminal gets away, and the cops who committed the criminal search also gets away. Nobody gets punished for doing something illegal. The only people hurt are the public who continue to have criminals and criminal behaving cops in their midst.
Dumbest possible outcome. In a sane world, evidence is admitted *NO MATTER HOW OBTAINED* and people obtaining evidence illegally *GO TO JAIL*.
But we live in a society where the legal system puts on this kabuki dance show to make everyone think they are professional and serious while they produce the most cockamamie and ridiculous results.
And you wonder why people are angry and confused when our ridiculous legal system does obviously stupid things?