In a court of law, yes, it would. I agree it appears pretty obvious what they were doing, but how do you know, for sure? Proof is on the accuser, and the accused are innocent until PROVEN guilty. This is definitely circumstantial evidence, but nothing concrete on its own. All things can depend on the judge, too, but what they really need are the system logs that show the exact activity that was taking place, to be conclusive. But if they could get the video in front of a court, and make them testify what they were doing, it might lead to something, but not concrete on its own. Thanks.
Have I yet conveyed to you how disgusting and incompetent I view the "courts"? This is the worst collection of idiots and liars in the United States. If they ever get anything right, it's an accident.
I agree it appears pretty obvious what they were doing, but how do you know, for sure?
There is a legal principle regarding the destruction of evidence. I forget what it is called, but the assumption is that if you are destroying evidence, it will be interpreted as being for the worst reasons.
All things can depend on the judge
And therein lies the problem. There are a *LOT* of corrupt judges, and there are a lot of *IDIOT* judges, and there are a lot of *CORRUPT IDIOT* judges. It's hard to find a competent/honest man in the legal system, especially as a judge.