· Intel Slava Z making claims of what non-Russian entities have confirmed without sourcing any claims.
· No actual British confirmation by any named British source for themselves.
· Graph used is not produced or copyrighted by the European Commission (and misrepresents the actual data, I'll get to that).
Let's go to the European Commission Radioactivity Environmental Monitoring web page, then go to the advanced map to look at the trend for station UA33429 in Khmelnytskyi (Хмельни́цький).
The spike in Nanosieverts per hour (nSv/h) happened on March 11, linear or logarithmic scale, and dropped on the morning of March 13, the day of the attack, and rose again. The rise before the attack could not have been caused by the attack. Because natural variation in background radiation is natural variation. Comparing Gateway's graph to the EC site data, Gateway's graph does not match the highs and lows on the EC data. Gateway's graph doesn't show that, because Gateway copied it off Twitter and Telegram, where it was made up.
The UK announced delivering DU rounds to Ukraine. Khmelnytskyi had a large explosion, when Khmelnytskyi was already having a spike in background gamma radiation. The Russian online troll response, make up data to show the radiation spike occurred after the strike, attribute it to a real world source, say the explosion and radiation spike must be connect to the delivery of DU rounds, treating speculation as proof.
Start it out on Telegram, spread it to Twitter. Let a gullible audience in the west spread and accept it at face value. Next.
Yeah, the sourcing for this nonsense is pure garbage. The Gateway Pundit is a joke.
One danger not mentioned here, but at another article posted today says Depleted Uranian shells are used by US and UK in tank warfare and tank manufacture. Today’s reports say Russia hit a store of these shells in Ukraine they had received from the UK.
Reporters may not ask questions about this issue as it is complex and little known. You can have a good jump on the media by reading the very detailed link below.
Some of what appears in this long, detaiLed link eather supports or disagrees with some of what i have read at this post and comments.