Replies

First of all thank you for your insightful reply. I am probably not enough up to on the info and if you could shed some additional light on the subject I will appreciate it. What about Russia’s claim about the interference by the US in he elections in 2014? Also about the continuous harassments of the ethnic Russian population in the eastern part of Ukraine? What about the encroachment of NATO along with the US along its border, with the possibility of installation of aggressive weapons, very similar if Russia would come to an arrangement with Mexico and do the same, would the US tolerate it?

First of all thank you for your insightful reply.

Thanks!

I am probably not enough up to on the info and if you could shed some additional light on the subject I will appreciate it. What about Russia’s claim about the interference by the US in [t]he elections in 2014?

It is incumbent upon the accuser or upon the entity making a claim to provide evidence and arguments to support any such accusation or claim.

What evidence and/or logical, evidence-based arguments has Russia provided to support any such accusation? Have you absorbed and analyzed Russia's arguments? Have you found them believable / plausible? If so: WHY?

Oh, wait: You have already admitted that you "aren't up enough" on the subject, so you would do best to refrain from already adopting a position that is not knowledge-based.

Also about the continuous harassments of the ethnic Russian population in the eastern part of Ukraine?

Ditto. What objective and credible evidence of "harassment" has Russia provided, and how does that - if true - justify Russia's invasion and seizure of vast swaths of Ukrainian territory?

What about the encroachment of NATO along with the US along its border, with the possibility of installation of aggressive weapons, very similar if Russia would come to an arrangement with Mexico and do the same, would the US tolerate it?

Your characterization of the voluntary accession of free democracies to NATO as "encroachment" constitutes "loaded language." Further, the analogy of Mexico joining the Warsaw Pact (or some modern-day equivalent) is absurd and laughable, and I am unwilling to entertain such a preposterous question.

Regards,