“YouTube has declared the video too “graphic” for viewers and has demonetized it”
This is pretty standard practice at YT. Most of the right wing streamers have to be very careful about using euphemisms and not showing certain things (even if they are just showing content that lefties post and get away with), just to not give the YT censors any excuse to demonetize.
For example, Sydney Watson, when she talks about trans people grooming kids, she always refers to the kids as “puddin people” so as not to get demonetized. Just saying you are talking about child abuse is probably enough for them to say it’s too graphic.
I’ve had videos age restricted. An art video of museum pieces, including nudes, that had over a million views. A video of Star Trek’s Captain Kirk kissing. ????????? My channel isn’t monetized, but age restrictions stop views dead. I have complained to reviewers and nothing.
We lived in a collapsed society, large portions of which have adopted Satanic beliefs & actions.
No civilized nation would have this.
Yes, depictions are ever so much more problematic than the actual abuse.
He has eyes that turn down at the outside corners. You tend to see these more frequently in high T types, football players, special forces, and some rapists and murderers, usually violent bad boy charmers.
It makes the simpering just between us girls affect even weirder.
FWIW.
Then there was this creepazoid who showed up in the DailyMail and then on FR yesterday--a intern doctor in family medicine who was filming kids with a hidden camera while examining them; caught with kiddie nude pix or porn on 60 different devices:
I'm old enough to remember when the U.S. had a daily Lord's prayer in the public schools; and then when the Supreme Court took prayer out of schools. The atheists fighting to remove it claimed it was hurting children. Now look.