Funeral directors do not receive the medical record. Funeral directors embalm bodies and plan funerals. It was the same story a while back when the antivaxx conga line was breathlessly reporting clots like never before in bodies. It came out that the funeral director who has his 15 minutes of fame admitted he could not know the vaccination status of the corpse.
In the same way funeral directors are not privy to the medical record. This when the headline says Funeral directors who never had a 15 die from a heart attack now have one a week” is the diagnosis of the funeral director.
I see no such information in the title or the article.
Meanwhile, dissect this for me: https://www.dhp.virginia.gov/funeral/fun_certificates.htm
I don’t think the article said the funeral directors DIAGNOSED the heart attacks, but certainly they would have a copy of, or access to, the death certificates. That would mean they would KNOW the cause of death. I’m pretty sure funeral homes can’t bury someone without a death certificate, otherwise the mob and cartels could just drop off their victims without any paperwork for instant cremation. Easy peazy.
It really does not matter whether funeral directors are diagnosing cause of death.
The bottom line is only two things.
The first is whether total deaths are significantly higher, and if so, why?
Total deaths is the only number that counts because it is the only number that is reliable. Read the explanations of the many who are doing the statistical studies abd you will see that some are using different years as baselines, some are counting reported as wu-flu only and some are adjusting up. down and sideways on age.
So the question remains: Regardless of how they died, do we or do we not have a higher death rate than normal, and if so, why?
Dr. Malone and his associates said early on that the clot shot affects every organ in the body and for that reason the the cause of death would not be clot-shots on the death certificate.
So we have another issue clouding the accuracy of the statistics and that is whether a medical examiner who determines a guy died from organ failure (choose the organ of your choice), is going to spend weeks or longer sifting through the dead’s medical history to determine what caused the organ to fail.
You know he is not. He will attribute the death to kidney failure, if that is the failed organ, and go on to the next victim.
To make that point clear: Even in a murder case, the coroner reports to the cops that a bullet killed the victim. He does not attempt to determine how or why the bullet got in his body. That is up to the cops. So as in this this discussion, all the medical examiner is telling us is that the patient is dead. Someone else needs to tell us why. and so far the medical profession is doing a very poor job.
So common sense trumps statistics.
Never forget that the bumble bee can not fly. Aerodynamically impossible. We know that because science tells us so.