[Bruce Campbells Chin]

I'm not debating with a link. You tell me, directly, what specific provisions of the Constitution authorize the Supreme Court to remove both the President and Congress from office.

There isn't one.

[philman_36]

I'm not debating with a link.

The link is to the case. The case has words. Read the words.

Disprove the argument presented BY the words therein.

You step into a debate and you don't even know the subject matter. AMAZING!

[philman_36]

I'll help you out... e) Due to the uniqueness of this case, the trial court does have proper authority to remove the Respondents from their offices under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 which states “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. ” A court adjudicating that the Respondents, who have taken the Oath of Office, to be incapable of holding their offices or who have adhered to a domestic enemy, means nothing without such removal of office.

It's a law passed by Congress and Constitutional, isn't it?