Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin; spacejunkie2001
If the lower court acts, SCOTUS is less likely to hear the case.

Ummmm...the 10th DID make a decision on the case.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

That's why Rule 11 was no longer needed. The 10th ruled AFTER the Rule 11 motion was already sent in.

If you had listened to any of the interviews you would know that.

78 posted on 12/12/2022 2:39:32 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin; spacejunkie2001
The Rules...
RULES OF THE Supreme Court of the United States

Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment
A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. ยง 2101(e).

80 posted on 12/12/2022 2:48:27 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
Ummmm...the 10th DID make a decision on the case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
That's why Rule 11 was no longer needed. The 10th ruled AFTER the Rule 11 motion was already sent in.


Well thank you for finally posting a link to the Tenth Circuit's decision. Reading that, instead of simply claiming a lack of jurisdiction over most of the parties, they decided to base their decision upon 1) the usual lack of "standing" and 2) sovereign immunity, and the lack of a coherent argument addressing that basis in the appellate brief by Mr. Brunson. It looks like typical hostility towards a pro se claim: the peasants are revolting so throw this case out of court. So, the Tenth Circuit used legal technicalities to avoid addressing national security, and the death of the Republic which are at issue in the case.

If you had listened to any of the interviews you would know that.

I am a visual learner. None of what was posted on GP made reference to the actual decision in the District Court or the Tenth Circuit, or a reasonable legal analysis of the case. I did listen to one interview, which didn't quite address the basis of decision below. I don't have time to listen to them all.
81 posted on 12/12/2022 3:05:14 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson