[philman_36]

Failing to perform the duties of an oath of office is more serious than a breach of ethics.
Don't be condescending like I was some ignorant boob.
I was replying to this...

All they need show is that there were serious issues raised...
The complaint gives further evidence that issues were raised.

No matter. The Congressional Record link above lets anybody read the play by play.

[Dr. Franklin]

The complaint gives further evidence that issues were raised.
No matter. The Congressional Record link above lets anybody read the play by play.

The issue of hacking the online election counting was raised, but never investigated.

[philman_36]

Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana. (in part) Mr. RASKIN and others today have cited the 12th Amendment, and they cite Article II, Section 1, Clause 3—re- member that, Clause 3. And they have asserted that Congress has only one narrow role today; we are just supposed to count the electoral votes that have been submitted. But those advocates have overlooked a critical first prin- ciple.
Their assertion is only true so long as Congress first is convinced that the electoral votes were not produced by a process that violated the Constitution is there. We have to get through Clause 2 of Article II, Section 1, before we get to Clause 3 is the point.

[JoeVortex]

This video is almost 38 minutes long. If you don’t want to sit through the whole thing, you only need to listen to the first 4 minutes to get the implications of the case.

My two cents is this is so monumental that SOCTUS will find some technicality to duck the issue.