Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin

“This should have been addressed in Texas v. Pennsylvani but wasn’t. Now we are grasping at straws that SCOTUS will finally address the matter “

Yes. I can’t believe they declined to hear it, and act on it. If they had, we might not be in the current mess.


118 posted on 12/12/2022 7:03:24 PM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam; Dr. Franklin
Now we are grasping at straws...

Yes.

In life it is better to have a straw than no straw.
(especially for malts)

Pardon my optimism.

120 posted on 12/12/2022 7:10:37 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: MayflowerMadam
Yes. I can’t believe they declined to hear it, and act on it. If they had, we might not be in the current mess.

I can opine on what judges should have done, and why, but they can be quite unpredictable. SCOTUS refused to hear a case between the states, which it was required to hear. Now we are left with this unprecedented case. The whole "standing" issue needs to be fixed by statute or constitutional amendment. Otherwise, things could get unpleasant.
139 posted on 12/13/2022 5:30:33 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson