Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This is about compelled speech. The Colorado Commies are trying to FORCE certain speech on people.

She is not denying anybody service. She’s not denying anybody because they are in this or that “protected class” (which should not exist anyway but that’s another matter). She’s saying she will happily do business with anybody BUT there are certain messages she will not do if they clash with her beliefs. She’s perfectly within her rights to refuse. The law here is blatantly unconstitutional.

Should for example, Jewish Website designers be required to design and build a website for the American Nazi Party if it comes to them? Under the Colorado law, they would be required to do so.

The 1st amendment is a total bar against compelled speech.


21 posted on 12/06/2022 3:21:50 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FLT-bird

I’ve argued the same examples and completely agree with you.

The gaystapo is just a little less tolerant than others.

Remember when the claim was “gay marriage doesn’t affect you, so why do you care?”.


22 posted on 12/06/2022 5:11:42 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson