Posted on 11/28/2022 12:34:49 PM PST by nikos1121
4 am ...
You're completely correct that the SC receives a very large number of petitions per year. This one though has apparently made it past step 1 where vertically all petitions are rejected. So, on to step 2 that is supposedly coming up for consideration quickly as the petition was accepted as an emergency.
I haven't tracked down the SC docket yet to try to verify the OP article and video. Will try and do that Tuesday afternoon or evening.
They took it off the sidebar in seconds.
A second FR post on this USCC subject. A more polished write up in the OP but still a higher end news source would be useful. Not sure higher end is the right word. The website is just not one I have crossed paths with enough to have an opinion about.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4112484/posts
“None of these guys are lawyers, and they have lost every flakey case they’ve filed.”
I would’ve been good if they had found a lawyer with SCOTUS experience to work with/for them on this. It’s an interesting case.
“I’m not sure that even if they win their case, that the requested relief is constitutional.”
SCOTUS ruled decades ago that “Fraud vitiates everything”. It’s very clear.
Problem is that SCOTUS has been too chickens—t to touch 2020 fraud issues, even saying that wronged and disenfranchised voters don’t have standing. If voters in an election don’t have standing, who the hell does? Really? I don’t hold out much hope that they’ll get involved.
You’d think they’d care, considering that free/fair elections impact their own positions and that court. Guess they don’t.
philman_36 wrote: “This is about actions not taken before the inauguration and after the election. I can post the relevant parts if you would like.”
go ahead.
According to the brothers' own website the case has been docketed. That means it's been received, logged and is on a list to be dealt with. They are requesting that the court hear their case, that is, grant certiorari.
That request will be denied without any consideration of the merits of the underlying case because the original court made the obvious ruling that you can't sue congressmen if they're acting in their capacity as congressmen. US legal system 101.
As if that wasn't enough, the brothers aren't even waiting until the 11th Circuit court hears their appeal.
This will never make it past the first clerk who looks at it. Just like almost all of these petitions.
I’m wondering if this gives the SC the opportunity to fight back against Congress. It’s been clear that over the past few years Congress, in the name of Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, etc. have intimidated and threatened supreme court justices. They’ve also threatened to increase the number of Supreme Court justices.
In one quick swoop, this would give the supreme court, a quick win and clear message to congress that they better not screw with us
“Pro se parties occasionally get lucky at SCOTUS by bringing cases that lawyers won’t touch for whatever reason. This may be just such a case.”
Encouraging. Let’s hope this will be a light in a dark time.
This is not newsworthy unless Oral Arguments are scbeduled or some Order has actually been issued.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
“Texas v. Pennsylvania. That was a dangerous precedent that it is now scrambling to correct somehow.”
Yes! That was a travesty when they refused to hear it — because of “standing”. I don’t recall how many states joined with Texas in that case, but there were a lot. If SCOTUS had dealt with that issue things might be totally different today.
Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States, purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this, whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy.
Sen. Cruz calls for commission to do emergency audit of election fraud claims
Ok
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.