[StAnDeliver]

"After Jan 6 Trump should've taken the stacked vote issue to the supreme court."

This is as unfortunately intentionally impossibly imparseably oblique 'assertion' -- and I'm being kind -- almost identical to another Freeper in another one of these ridiculous threads, who insisted that J6 was void due to "general nonconformity to statutory law."

The upshot is that, as a matter of historical fact, not opinion, Pence approved the 1+1 Objection to the AZ elector slate just before everyone was moved down to the subway -- where Pence was ensconsed in the DC Congressional subway with more security than probably anyone other than Trump -- and Pence approved the 1+1 Objection to the PA elector slate after they returned once the protestor tours were concluded, rejecting enormous pressure to simply ignore the PA challenge, which ensued long after midnight.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "(stacking the vote on) J6 was void due to "general nonconformity to statutory law."

you're conflating two different votes. The stacking the vote was with Regard to the objection made which was a valid objection do you not agree?

The Objection made which was, "all of the known circumstances, regularly given."
Referring to the Covid rules given by bureaucratic and not approved by legislators.