[FreeReign]

New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach,” Musk tweeted. New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.

Here come the nonsense rationalizations.

[Sarcazmo]

No kidding. Freedom of reach, what the heck does that even mean?

[V K Lee]

In all fairness, Musk is showing a pair of walnuts.
His belief of free speech is showing: the post is still on
line for any to see. Has he once mentioned that he would be
abstaining from his free speech? It looks as though two points were being made which, to my understanding, is the
intention of an open forum. Not a tweeter and know little as to the operations before/after EM. Please consider these comments from one who resides outside the box.

[PeterPrinciple]

New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach,” Musk tweeted. New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
Here come the nonsense rationalizations.

---

All that has happened according to the article is that comments are not allowed and it will not be included for his advertising revenue.

We can still post it and comment on your own site such as FR. Others can find it and make their own judgment just without the comments.

I think it a pretty smart move. A way of controlling the discussion in an indirect way. Freedom of speech has never been absolute.

Our discussion is controlled here on FR also.
I am not on twitter nor intend to be.