ENTER SCOTUS: High Court Agrees to Hear Case Threatening Big Tech’s Section 230 Protections

NewsBusters ^ | 10/3/2022 | Joseph Vazquez

[1Old Pro]

It says lame-ass bloggers can’t sue Jim just because they think Laz defamed them.

How many women has Laz defamed? By my count, he hasn't identified a single one he wouldn't hit.

[nwrep]

Roberts is on our side on this one.

[semimojo]

By my count, he hasn't identified a single one he wouldn't hit.

Fair.

[WMarshal]

"The Constitution is on the side of private business against government intrusions."

You sound like an idiot who would cheer telecommunication companies monitoring and dropping Americans's phone calls if they spoke the wrongthink. Mark my words, the voice recognition and artificial intelligence technology already exists to do it tomorrow.

[cuz1961]

Say goodbye to the 1st Amendment.

[Jim W N]

Facebook and Twitter are NOT telecommunication companies.

Get a clue and quit siding with the fascist Left.

[WMarshal]

You are like talking to a wall.

[Jim W N]

Take a couple of valium, go to bed, and DON’T call me in the morning.

I obviously will not get anywhere with you.

In the meantime, keep stoking the Leftist b#llsh#t.

[BobL]

“Just remember, Section 230 is what keeps FR possible.”

I suspect that the Supreme Court can distinguish between bulk sites with millions or billions of users and ‘boutique’ sites, like FR, and will write their opinion to clearly respect that difference.

In any case, it’s completely INTOLERABLE living in Soviet-Style country where the government controls, either directly or with collusion from big tech, virtually everything that 80% (or more) of the country knows about the rest of the world.

That has to end, and hopefully the Supreme Court will do just that.

[BobL]

“but denying conservatives the same level of connectivity as liberals on a social media platform especially during elections reeks of illegality.”

Absolutely ILLEGAL. No different than the phone company (which is also a ‘private’ company) shutting off the phones to the Reagan Campaign in 1980. Whether or not they wanted to do it, they knew it was illegal as hell.

[BobL]

“Say goodbye to the 1st Amendment.”

First Amendment was gone once Facebook SILENCED Trump, and before that when the entire media got away with flat-out lying that Trump ‘colluded’ with Russia.

The First Amendment was nice while all sides tried to play by the rules, but it wasn’t designed to handle today’s Democrats controlling the media - it never had a chance.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Once again, oh so wrong.

I know you are a paid democrat shill but could you please say something truthful once in a while?

Just to make it interesting.

[WMarshal]

Do you have the mentality of a cheese-eating surrender monkey. Go to DU.

[Jim W N]

You’re initial uncalled-for nasty response to me was stupid and you’ve gone from dumb to dumber.

So far, you’ve got nothing affirmative to offer. What are you some kind of Leftist plant here?

Go away and don’t never come back.

[WMarshal]

Jeb! Is that you?

[Jim W N]

Facebook and Twitter are NOT telecommunication companies. Get a clue and quit siding with the fascist Left.

Let's see, is that when you completely went off the rails?

You're long on stupid and short on actual substance.

Hey, I thought I told you to go take a couple of valium, go to bed, and DON'T come back.

Get lost Dork.

[Wallace T.]

The problem with several content providers, such as Rumble or Bitchute, is that, unless you want to see dozens of denunciations of the latest leftist atrocity, along with speculation about the hidden hands of the Jesuits, the Jews, or the Masons, with an occasional holistic health and survivalist tips, you would have no interest in them.

[WMarshal]

You are a sad, little bottom-boy who takes it up the backside from communists and who loves it. Get help.

[WMarshal]

Jim W N, did I hurt your cowardly feelings?

[who_would_fardels_bear]

You nailed it.