Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

It seems to me that a lawyer could craft an argument that lack of “election integrity “ even the suspension of a lack of it violated “equal protection”.


7 posted on 09/23/2022 3:07:21 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Reily
"It seems to me that a lawyer could craft an argument that lack of “election integrity “ even the suspension of a lack of it violated “equal protection”."

I agree, but without some evidence backing the suspicion, I think a state could easily say, we have sufficient controls and this is a state matter, there is no Federal jusisdiction.

Besides if you have controls for federal elections that are audited, it's highly likely the state will adopt those controls for state elections as well. They wouldn't have two sets of standards, that would easily be attacked by legislators at the state level.

8 posted on 09/23/2022 3:20:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

Disclaimer: DannyTN is not an election lawyer, but he plays one on FR.


9 posted on 09/23/2022 3:21:31 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

Typo
Note suspension = suspicious


10 posted on 09/23/2022 3:57:03 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

Typo
Note suspension = suspicion


11 posted on 09/23/2022 3:57:27 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson