Spot on, Judy.
Was just about to post the same.
I think it’s just a case of looking at different numbers. When you enlarge the picture (that is, look at 1500 doctors using the facility) and a long time line, then the numbers don’t look so questionable.
I don’t think you can look at it that way. For instance, were all of those 1500 doctors recipients of the jab at roughly the same time? If not, then that number is irrelevant - doesn’t even enter the picture. All I’m looking at is six dead doctors, all having received the jab shortly beforehand. Most healthy. Also, I won’t even discount those suffering with an illness. The reason I won’t is that they all were classed as dying unexpectedly. I have a former neighbor who just died the other day of colon cancer. He was diagnosed over 3 years ago with stage 4 colon cancer. For the last 3 years he carried on, looked healthy as a horse, and you wouldn’t have known he was fighting cancer. He didn’t just drop dead suddenly. The disease progressed slowly, and they could see his end getting closer and closer.
In any case, I guess numbers can be worked to support any argument, but I just don’t see the reason anyone would do that. I don’t like it when people make things up or sensationalize either, but there’s no way on God’s green earth that 6 doctors dying unexpectedly very shortly after taking the shot is coincidence. Not in my book.