And you would be wrong like most mush heads who couldn’t read a legal brief to save their lives.
How about you read up on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) then get back to the class on how life saving procedures are not explicitly mandated in that act to include terminations should the life of the mother be in danger. I’ll wager a months pay you fail to construct a legitimate legal argument let alone find precedence in case law to refute exactly what the Federal government just reminded the hospitals they are bound by Federal law to do with the full weight of the Federal supremacy clause firmly in the gov side here.
Only laws pursuant to the Constitution apply in the Supremacy Clause.
The Commerce Clause does not allow the federal government to have human beings murdered.
The supply of houses to the market would be increased if renters could shoot existing homeowners dead.