Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: David Chase

You don’t need to be under oath when you confess to a crime for it to be admissible. The jury would decide whether or not his various confessions are truthful. The videos and his overall history would both add credence to his statements.


19 posted on 07/11/2022 5:25:00 PM PDT by dead (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_vFiUUcBkc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: dead

You can confess to being the Hillside Strangler all over Social Media and on T.V. all month long.

Should you be arrested for that? If so, for what crime?

All Hunter Biden needs to do is ask to see the proof that it was actually crack in the video. And guess what, the only proof there is comes from Hunter Biden and his own produced video.

He will deny it was crack and claim it was just a prank.

Prove it was crack.

No one can prove it was crack.
There is no chain of custody, there is no crack as evidence, the crack in the video was never tested to prove its crack.

It was white clumps…..cheese perhaps that Hunter was joking with.
Prove that’s a lie.
You can’t.


30 posted on 07/11/2022 6:09:58 PM PDT by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson