Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

It’s a huge win for the pro-life side. It means that abortion can be argued on the basis of science instead of making all discussion moot by putting it beyond debate and into a judicial lockbox.


7 posted on 06/25/2022 9:07:12 PM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

Interesting that the abortionists in Congress make so much noise about losing in the supreme court when they could have taken abortion up in the legislative branch....but didn’t. Their apparent intention was to keep their own hands clean while tarnishing the judicial branch. No politician wants to run on passing abortion laws, no matter WHAT they say. That is why they pushed so hard to keep the stain on the court. Now if the progressive radicalists want to keep killing babies, they will have to answer to the people with the blood on their own hands instead of the courts hands. Looks like a new day for those without a voice to get one and a new dilemma for those loud mouthed politicians who have openly stated they will vote for abortion legislation but in reality will not run on it because THEY know that their chances of being elected or reelected for their stance on abortion will be just as dead as the babies they have killed over the past 50 years. My question to all abortionists is simple. Isn’t 50 years of baby killing enough for you?


16 posted on 06/25/2022 9:33:32 PM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" LStar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson