Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K
As he said- the south were not ‘rebelling’ they were seceding.

They were rebelling. Look it up. It's in all the history books.

They posed no threat to Washington, until Washington made war on them.

Shooting up a fort and forcing it to surrender is an odd way of demonstrating peaceful intent.

They were seceding AS THEY WERE PROMISED they would be able to do.

Promised where?

I have said it often, the civil war (the first, and last I hope) was more about states rights than anything else.

State's right to do what?

108 posted on 06/23/2022 5:16:14 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg; Mr. K
They were rebelling. Look it up. It's in all the history books.

Just like January 6 was an "insurrection!" When you control all the levers of communications, you can put lies into the history books.

Promised where?

Declaration of Independence. It is quite clear on the point.

State's right to do what?

Run their own trade and economics. They already had the right to continue slavery in the Union, (and would have continued to do so in the Union) so we know it isn't that.

111 posted on 06/24/2022 8:01:56 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson