Nazi positions collapsing in Donbas

The Saker ^ | 5/20/22 | Saker Staff

[Jane Austen]

What a sick comment.

[Jane Austen]

What a sick comment.

[Svartalfiar]

...You do realize your linked ‘evidence’ is an opinion piece written on a liberal news network, right?

[Svartalfiar]

The Russians stopped being communists in 1991.

So then what are they now? I'll take the official answer, and the realistic one :p

[Parmy]

"How much have the oligarchs we are protecting contributing to the war effort?"

Biden, et al, has just sent 40 billion there to be laundered. Draw your own conclusions.

[Reily]

Authoritarian!

You can be authoritarian and not be communist\socialist.
More examples of those throughout history then communists\socialists. Communism\Socialism includes an all-encompassing economic system. Russia no longer has that.

Or Fascist if you need a 20th century label.

[eyedigress]

Nah. When you find you have landed on the same page as Joy Behar and Joe (my underwear has been changed) Biden, it is probably best to burn the book.

[Clemenza]

No more sick than the people who cheer on a thug invading and killing a neighboring nation.

[Dogbert41]

I’ll tell you if you can tell me what the US is now.

[ganeemead]

“Intel Slava Z
🇷🇺🇺🇦❗The so-called “commander” of “Azov” was taken out in a special armored car because of the hatred of the Mariupol residents and the desire for reprisals against him - Russian Ministry of Defense...
“

[freeandfreezing]

But you don’t go after western propaganda and only point out Russia on this because libtards and Biden sipupporters support the liberal MSM.

That kind of logic sounds like something from an Auntie Anne's pretzel store.

Show me some western propaganda as false as the Russian propaganda and I'll go after it too. I have pointed out lies in the leftist media for years.

Being a patsy for Russia and spreading their propaganda as many people do today on Free Republic is not working against the Biden administration. It is just working for Russia. What is the point of that?

[freeandfreezing]

Biden, et al, has just sent 40 billion there to be laundered.

Use your brain and think. If we ship military equipment and ammunition from the United States to Ukraine where does the money go? It goes to US based manufacturers who make the equipment and ammunition. Those US based manufacturers use that money to pay their American employees, and buy materials and parts from other American companies.

How is that a bad thing?

[freeandfreezing]

The Azov, a neo-Nazi unit of the National Guard, would render aid to a fellow Nazi. The Communist Russians would likely deny him aid for the same reason - he's an Azov sympathizer.

The guy in the pictures is an officer in the Russian army, now a POW in Ukraine.

Do you realize that the mythical Azov battalion consisted of a few thousand soldiers who were mostly surrounded in Mariupol? And somehow in your mind they are everywhere like the monster from under your bed.

[citizen]

“I am a MAGA person and I want our borders defended and our money spent here helping Americans.”

---

This. Your reply was a non sequitur.

[citizen]

I’m not rooting for any of them, they are both thugs and we should stay out of it.

---

This.

[Parmy]

It's a bad thing because those weapons don't always go to whom they are sent. They are and have been black-marketed to other bad actors.

Do you have any idea where all the weapons and equipment left in Afghanistan ended up.

Without a doubt in my mind that you accuse of not using some of it now resides in Iran and maybe in some African countries.

For your information I try not to just use my head for keeping my neck from unraveling.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

If we ship military equipment and ammunition from the United States to Ukraine where does the money go? It goes to US based manufacturers who make the equipment and ammunition. Those US based manufacturers use that money to pay their American employees, and buy materials and parts from other American companies. How is that a bad thing?

At the risk of unintentionally sounding flippant, are you a sociopath? You certainly sound as if you completely lack a conscience. Tens of thousands of people will be killed with these weapons. That is a "bad thing". In addition, the US will end up spending at least another ten times this rebuilding all the infrastructure these weapons will destroy.

[freeandfreezing]

You certainly sound as if you completely lack a conscience. Tens of thousands of people will be killed with these weapons.

You have a strange morality. Every weapon that is used in a violent situation may kill people. Police don't carry pistols for decorative purposes, they carry them so that they can kill people if necessary to protect society. Same with our military, and that's also the reason we have the 2nd amendment.

Providing weapons and ammunition to the people in Ukraine so that they can defend themselves against attack by a tyrannical neighbor is the right thing to do. If your neighbor was getting attacked by a gang of thugs who invaded their house would you give them a weapon to defend themselves and kill the thugs or would you let them be killed while you smugly felt good about not letting some criminals get killed?

You can't really believe that providing weapons so that people can defend themselves from an invading army is a bad thing to do unless you are a Quaker, or some other total pacifist.

[freeandfreezing]

It's a bad thing because those weapons don't always go to whom they are sent.

That doesn't seem to be a problem in this situation, you can see the howitzers in action in Ukraine.

Don't blame anybody for leaving the weapons in Ukraine except for the fools in our current administration who made that dumb decision.

[freeandfreezing]

Don't blame anybody for leaving the weapons in *** Afghanistan *** except for the fools in our current administration who made that dumb decision.

Someday my typing will improve.